Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
3 points by almkglor 6128 days ago | link | parent

(1) Agree

(2) Could be done, and have interfaces simply act as a shortcut way of saying "I have (for objects) or need (for functions) the following: a, b, c, and d"

(4) LOL. We're making an informally-specified, ad-hoc, bug-ridden implementation of half of CLOS. ^^



2 points by sacado 6128 days ago | link

"We're making an informally-specified, ad-hoc, bug-ridden implementation of half of CLOS"

That's what I thought when I was thinking about solutions for these problems :)

I think (1) could be solved simply by using redef on each polymorphic function : if car becomes polymorphic, just encapsulate the desired behavior in a new definition of car that will do the dynamic dispatch for you. If you want a specific version of car (e.g. the array implementation), just call it explicitly : (array-car x) .

-----