Can't prove a negative, but I've already explained why I think I'm right.
>Intentionally? How so?
When they claim to fake closures with contexts, they're wrong. Now they're either confused or trying to confuse other people.
>Cite please.
"In newLISP lexical state-full closures are not realized using lambda closures but using lexical namespaces." http://www.newlisp.org/ExpressionEvaluation.html
It's the first hit on google for `newlisp closure'.
>What if I called you a jerk?
I would be immediately converted to newlisp by the strength of your arguments and the size of your e-penis.