Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
2 points by tel 6158 days ago | link | parent

Somewhere earlier pg suggested that he'll probably want to have more than just optional parameters at some point in the future. The idea was that at least as of now (o ...) is more robust.


2 points by bogomipz 6158 days ago | link

Here's the other thread;

http://arclanguage.org/item?id=2052

It started with the idea of using ? rather than o, then someone suggested using only one ? for all optional arguments.

-----