Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
8 points by pg 6162 days ago | link | parent

I want to conserve ? for future use as ssyntax.


4 points by nex3 6162 days ago | link

What about =? This would make a lot of sense for optional parameters with defaults, because it signifies assigning to the parameter if it's not given.

Granted, it would make less sense for just-plain-optional params, but it would be easier to visually pick out of the param list than o.

-----

3 points by shiro 6161 days ago | link

But isn't it possible that you have foo?bar as ssyntax and a lone ? for other purpose?

-----

1 point by nex3 6160 days ago | link

But what if he wants to conserve the lone ? as well?

-----

1 point by shiro 6160 days ago | link

Well we can only speculate. He said he wants to reserve '?' for ssyntax, and I pointed out '?' in ssyntax and lone '?' can coexist. If he also reserve lone '?', that's his decision.

-----