Arc Forum
new
|
comments
|
leaders
|
submit
login
6 points
by
jfm3
6169 days ago |
link
|
parent
Small idea: Since Arc does major surgery on traditional Lisp syntax quirks, I think it should reclaim < and > as parenthesis, rather than symbol characters. Instead of (< n 0) you'd write (lt n 0), and use < for something else.
7 points
by
pg
6169 days ago |
link
That might happen if I can think of a use for <...> as good as [...]. Or they could become intra-symbol dividers like :.
-----
6 points
by
tel
6169 days ago |
link
It's not a popular idea in lisps, but set terminology, "list comprehensions", would be an interesting thing to see.
<(fn x y) : (take x xs) (take y ys) (assert (pred x y))>
Of course, if you're going to do that, {} is probably the logical choice...
-----