> Is there a technical reason for having back-quote as a separate notation? Why can't an ordinary quote be unquotable? I've always wondered if this is just an onion.
I guess I already knew the answer would have to do with nested quotes, but I see it more clearly now. It's very simple really; what the plain quote buys you is the ability to unquote once instead of twice when using quote inside quasiquote.
Do people that write a lot of macros feel that's such a precious feature?